55 lines
3.8 KiB
Markdown
55 lines
3.8 KiB
Markdown
# Code Review Checklist
|
|
|
|
Currently, all changes to the product must be reviewed by a [core committer](core-committers.md).
|
|
|
|
## If you are a community member seeking a review
|
|
|
|
1. Submit your pull request (PR).
|
|
* Follow the [contribution checklist](../contribution-checklist/).
|
|
2. Wait for a reviewer to be assigned.
|
|
* Product managers are on the lookout for new pull requests and usually handle this for you automatically.
|
|
* If you have been working alongside a core committer, feel free to message them for help.
|
|
* When in doubt, ask for help in the [Focalboard](https://community.mattermost.com/core/channels/focalboard) channel on our community server.
|
|
* If you are still stuck, please message Chen Lim (@chenilim on GitHub).
|
|
3. [Wait for a review](#if-you-are-awaiting-a-review).
|
|
* Expect some interaction with at least one reviewer within 5 business days (weekdays, Monday through Friday, excluding [statutory holidays](https://docs.mattermost.com/process/working-at-mattermost.html#holidays)).
|
|
* Keep in mind that core committers are geographically distributed around the world and likely in a different time zone than your own.
|
|
* If no interaction has occurred after 5 business days, please [at-mention](https://github.blog/2011-03-23-mention-somebody-they-re-notified/) a reviewer with a comment on your pull request.
|
|
4. Make any necessary changes.
|
|
* If a reviewer requests changes, your pull request will disappear from their queue of reviews.
|
|
* Once you've addressed the concerns, please at-mention the reviewer with a comment on your pull request.
|
|
5. Wait for your code to be merged.
|
|
* Larger pull requests may require more time to review.
|
|
* Once all reviewers have approved your changes, they will handle merging your code.
|
|
|
|
## If you are awaiting a review
|
|
|
|
1. Wait patiently for reviews to complete.
|
|
* Expect some interaction with each of your reviewers within 5 business days.
|
|
* There is no need to explicitly mention them on the pull request or to explicitly reach out on our community server.
|
|
2. Make any necessary changes.
|
|
* If a reviewer requests changes, your pull request will disappear from their queue of reviews.
|
|
* Once you've addressed the concerns, assign them as a reviewer again to put your pull request back in their queue.
|
|
|
|
## If you are a core committer asked to give a review
|
|
|
|
1. Respond promptly to requested reviews.
|
|
* Assume the requested review is urgent and blocking unless explicitly stated otherwise.
|
|
* Try to interact with the author within 2 business days.
|
|
* Configure the GitHub plugin to automate notifications.
|
|
* Review your outstanding requested reviews daily to avoid blocking authors.
|
|
* Prioritize earlier milestones when reviewing to help with the release process.
|
|
* Responding quickly doesn't necessarily mean reviewing quickly! Just don't leave the author hanging.
|
|
2. Feel free to clarify expectations with the author.
|
|
* If the code is experimental, they may need only a cursory glance and thumbs up to proceed with productizing their changes.
|
|
* If the review is large or complex, additional time may be required to complete your review. Be upfront with the author.
|
|
* If you are not comfortable reviewing the code, avoid "rubber stamping" the review. Be honest with the author and ask them to consider another core committer.
|
|
3. Never rush a review.
|
|
* Take the time necessary to review the code thoroughly.
|
|
* Don't be afraid to ask for changes repeatedly until all concerns are addressed.
|
|
* Feel free to challenge assumptions and timelines. Rushing a change into a patch release may cause more harm than good.
|
|
4. Avoid leaving a review hanging.
|
|
* Try to accept or reject the review instead of just leaving comments.
|
|
5. Merge the pull request.
|
|
* Do not merge if there are outstanding changes requested.
|
|
* Merge the pull request, and delete the branch if not from a fork.
|