Docs: Improve nuance and tone even more
Signed-off-by: Michael Mayer <michael@liquidbytes.net>
This commit is contained in:
parent
8af7b25f27
commit
558150e6f6
1 changed files with 13 additions and 26 deletions
39
README.md
39
README.md
|
@ -77,19 +77,25 @@ This project is about freedom but not necessarily about free beer. We feel like
|
|||
our side to state there will be no costs, because clearly we have huge expenses, your server hardware
|
||||
is not for free and then maybe you'd like to have some extra features that need to be developed.
|
||||
|
||||
We do this because we think it's important.
|
||||
It's somewhat disappointing how little support we get by companies and especially public organizations who should
|
||||
share similar goals. Not a single dollar.
|
||||
It's fair to say that users with basic needs will have no monthly costs. We are also way more productive and effective
|
||||
per dollar (or euro) than commercial projects. If you include development time, hardware and travel expenses,
|
||||
we'll have spent $100k+ when this is done.
|
||||
|
||||
The consequence is that we are forced to think about monetization. We honestly didn't expect this will be an issue
|
||||
and didn't ask for anything the first year.
|
||||
You're invited to come to our place and work for free if you think time and travel expenses should not be counted.
|
||||
Please also bring some free test devices and use the internet on your mobile phone while working 16 to 20 hours per day.
|
||||
Just to give you an idea, please don't feel sorry for us! We're adults and are fully aware what we have gotten ourselves into.
|
||||
|
||||
Specific solutions could be to...
|
||||
Basically all established OSS companies make 90% of their revenue with enterprise customers, that's why private users
|
||||
and single developers typically get everything for free. Obviously that doesn't work if you have only private users.
|
||||
In our opinion it makes the most sense to finance this like all public infrastructure, our expenses are peanuts compared
|
||||
to building a road.
|
||||
|
||||
Other specific solutions could be to...
|
||||
|
||||
- sell a tested & supported version in the app store while our contributors and other developers can
|
||||
continue to use Docker or build from source
|
||||
- offer a geodata, public events and maps subscription since OpenStreetMap doesn't want us to use their development
|
||||
API for production
|
||||
API for production, which is perfectly fine
|
||||
|
||||
## Donations ##
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -103,30 +109,11 @@ have to charge for a geodata subscription later.
|
|||
Also please [leave a star](https://github.com/photoprism/photoprism/stargazers) on GitHub if you like this project,
|
||||
it provides additional motivation to keep going.
|
||||
|
||||
Financial support makes a huge difference and enables us to spend more time with the features you care about.
|
||||
Ideas backed by a sponsor are marked with a golden [sponsor](https://github.com/photoprism/photoprism/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3Asponsor) label.
|
||||
Let us know if we mistakenly label an idea as [unfunded](https://github.com/photoprism/photoprism/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3Aunfunded).
|
||||
|
||||
Thank you very much! <3
|
||||
|
||||
## Lessons learned ##
|
||||
|
||||
Having done mostly commercial projects in the last 10+ years, it is important for us to explore various forms of funding
|
||||
and communication for independent Open Source projects. Note that many of today's popular projects are backed by
|
||||
corporations like Google, Facebook, Microsoft or Intel.
|
||||
|
||||
That's a good thing and we profit from it, but doesn't mean independent developers should not do this full-time or pay
|
||||
everything themselves without asking the community for support. In fact, crowdfunding is a common way to cover
|
||||
development expenses and it's strange to criticize us for not delivering a complete product before we ask.
|
||||
|
||||
In no way do we spurn other OSS projects like [OpenStreetMap](https://www.openstreetmap.org/),
|
||||
as a Twitter user suggested. We just state the fact that even a non-commercial app can't use their API
|
||||
for production, which is perfectly fine.
|
||||
On the other hand, that doesn't mean we have to provide this service for free to our users.
|
||||
|
||||
We understand money is a very sensitive topic most of our users don't engage with.
|
||||
For this reason, we'll exclude this topic from our social media communication from now on.
|
||||
|
||||
## Public and corporate sponsorship ##
|
||||
|
||||
We spent weeks asking organizations like [The Prototype Fund](https://prototypefund.de/en/) for help
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue